CPT Code 99212: Documentation, Billing, and Reimbursement (2026)

Key Takeaways

99212 requires 10-19 minutes total time or low complexity MDM

Cannot be billed for new patients – established patients only

Time-based or MDM-based billing options available since 2021

Medicare pays approximately $75-80 nationally for 99212 in 2026

Most common E/M code used by family physicians

What is CPT Code 99212?

CPT code 99212 describes an office or outpatient visit for an established patient requiring 10-19 minutes of total practitioner time or straightforward medical decision-making. The American Medical Association (AMA) maintains this code within the Evaluation and Management (E/M) service category, specifically under established patient office visits codes ranging from 99211 to 99215.

This code applies when a patient returns for follow-up care, routine monitoring, or uncomplicated acute issues. A comprehensive guide to 10-19 minute patient visits outlines the specific documentation requirements for time-based billing.

The 2021 E/M guideline revisions allow clinicians to select 99212 using either total time spent on the visit date or the level of medical decision-making documented. Most primary care practices use 99212 for brief follow-ups: medication refills, straightforward chronic disease monitoring, or single-system acute complaints with minimal diagnostic complexity.

According to CMS Physician Fee Schedule data, 99212 carries lower work RVUs than higher-level codes but remains the second most frequently billed established patient code across family medicine, internal medicine, and pediatrics. The code’s popularity reflects its fit for routine care workflows: brief visits addressing single concerns without extensive data review or high-risk management decisions.

CPT Code 99212 Documentation Requirements

Proper documentation supports both time-based and MDM-based billing pathways. For time-based billing, clinicians must record total time spent on the visit date, including face-to-face interaction, review of test results performed that day, and documentation completed immediately after the encounter. Time spent on tasks occurring before or after the visit date – such as reviewing records the night before or coordinating care the following day – does not count toward the 10-19 minute threshold.

MDM-based billing requires documenting two of three MDM elements at the straightforward level: limited problems addressed, minimal or no data reviewed, and minimal risk of complications. A straightforward MDM encounter typically involves a self-limited or minor problem requiring no additional workup. Examples include uncomplicated upper respiratory infections, follow-up visits for stable chronic conditions with no treatment changes, or simple prescription renewals.

Required Chart Elements for 99212

Every 99212 note must include a chief complaint, relevant history of present illness, appropriate exam elements, and a treatment plan. The 2021 guidelines eliminated detailed history and exam requirements, but clinicians must still document medically appropriate history and exam for the presenting problem. A brief HPI (location, duration, severity of the single problem) and a focused exam suffice for most 99212 visits.

If using time as the basis, document start and stop times or total minutes in the chart. Many AI-powered clinical documentation tools now auto-calculate time from session length and flag when documentation supports a higher code level. If using MDM, explicitly state the problem complexity, data reviewed, and risk level to demonstrate straightforward criteria.

How to Bill CPT Code 99212: Time-Based vs MDM-Based Criteria

Clinicians choose between two pathways: time-based or MDM-based. Time-based billing counts all practitioner time on the visit date. This includes preparation immediately before the encounter (reviewing labs drawn that morning), face-to-face or telehealth interaction, and documentation completed immediately after. It excludes pre-visit phone calls, care coordination performed the day after, or staff time.

MDM-based billing evaluates problem complexity, data reviewed, and management risk. Healthcare providers should reference moderate-level medical decision-making documentation standards when selecting between coding pathways.

For 99212, straightforward MDM means addressing one self-limited problem with minimal data review and minimal risk. A urinary tract infection follow-up where the patient improved on antibiotics, no cultures were reviewed, and no new medications were prescribed fits straightforward MDM. Proper assessment and treatment plan documentation ensures clear justification for code selection.

A diabetes follow-up with A1C review, medication adjustment, and discussion of insulin initiation would exceed straightforward complexity.

When visits involve counseling or coordination consuming more than half the encounter time, clinicians may use time as the controlling factor even if MDM appears lower. For example, a 15-minute visit where 10 minutes addressed medication adherence barriers justifies time-based 99212 billing despite minimal clinical complexity.

99212 Time Threshold Breakdown

The 10-19 minute range defines 99212 under time-based billing. Visits lasting exactly 10 minutes qualify. Visits at 20 minutes move to 99213. If a clinician spends 18 minutes with a patient and 2 minutes documenting immediately after, the total 20 minutes supports 99213. Accurate time tracking matters because a single minute shifts code selection and reimbursement.

Many practices use integrated scheduling software with time-tracking widgets embedded in the charting workflow. These tools auto-populate start and stop times, calculate total minutes, and suggest the appropriate code based on documented time. This automation reduces manual calculation errors and supports compliant billing.

Automate CPT Code Selection and Time Tracking

See how Pabau's integrated E/M code library and time-tracking tools reduce billing errors and support compliant 99212 documentation.

Book a demo

CPT Code 99212 Reimbursement Rates and RVU Values

According to the 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, 99212 carries a national average reimbursement of approximately $75-80 for Medicare patients. Actual payments vary by geographic location due to Medicare’s Geographic Practice Cost Index (GPCI) adjustments. A practice in San Francisco receives higher reimbursement than a rural Kansas clinic billing the same code.

The total RVU for 99212 is approximately 0.93, consisting of work RVUs (0.70), practice expense RVUs (0.45), and malpractice RVUs (0.03). These values determine Medicare payment amounts when multiplied by the conversion factor. Commercial payers typically reimburse 110-150% of Medicare rates, though contract terms vary significantly by insurer and region. Private payer reimbursement ranges between $45 and $65 depending on contracted fee schedules and geographic adjustments.

Regional Reimbursement Variations

Medicare adjustments mean the same 99212 visit generates different revenue depending on practice location. A New York City practice might receive $95 for 99212 while a Mississippi practice receives $70. Commercial insurers apply their own fee schedules, often negotiated independently of Medicare rates. Practices should verify contracted rates with each payer to forecast accurate revenue per visit type.

Some private insurers reimburse based on billed charges rather than fee schedules. In these cases, practices set their own charge amounts. However, most established commercial contracts tie payments to Medicare’s relative value structure, making RVU-based payment the norm for 99212 across most payer mixes.

Common 99212 Billing Errors and How to Avoid Them

The most frequent 99212 billing error involves using the code for new patient visits. CPT code 99212 applies exclusively to established patients – those seen by the same provider or a provider in the same group practice within the past three years. Billing 99212 for a new patient triggers automatic claim denials because new patients require codes from the 99201-99205 series.

Insufficient time documentation causes the second most common denial. When using time-based billing, the chart must explicitly state total minutes or include start and stop times. Vague phrases like “brief visit” or “short follow-up” fail to support the 10-19 minute threshold. Many claims management platforms flag missing time documentation before claim submission, reducing denial rates.

MDM Documentation Pitfalls

When billing 99212 based on MDM, clinicians must document straightforward complexity. Understanding when straightforward treatment is considered appropriate helps avoid common MDM documentation errors that trigger claim denials.

This means one self-limited problem with minimal data review and minimal risk. Notes that mention multiple problems, extensive lab review, or medication adjustments often support higher code levels. Auditors reject 99212 claims when documentation shows moderate or high complexity MDM elements.

Another common error involves billing 99212 with modifiers that contradict established patient status. Modifier 57 (decision for surgery) or modifier 25 (significant, separately identifiable E/M service) paired with 99212 raises audit flags. These modifiers typically apply to higher-complexity visits, and their presence alongside 99212 suggests potential upcoding or incorrect code selection.

99212 vs 99213: When to Use Each Code

The distinction between 99212 and 99213 hinges on time or MDM complexity. For time-based billing, 99212 applies to 10-19 minute visits while 99213 requires 20-29 minutes. One additional minute of documented time shifts the code. For MDM-based billing, 99212 requires straightforward complexity while 99213 demands low complexity – meaning two or more self-limited problems, limited data review, or low risk of complications.

A diabetes follow-up where the patient’s glucose remains stable, no medication changes occur, and no new labs are reviewed fits 99212. The same diabetes patient presenting with new neuropathy symptoms, requiring A1C and foot exam, and receiving medication adjustments moves to 99213 due to increased problem complexity and risk. According to AMA CPT guidelines, clinicians should select the code that best reflects the work performed, not arbitrarily alternate between codes to achieve target distributions.

Code Selection Decision Tree

Start by determining patient status: new or established. If established, assess whether time or MDM drives code selection. If time, record total minutes and select the code matching that range. If MDM, evaluate problem complexity, data reviewed, and risk level. Choose the code where documentation supports at least two of three MDM elements at the appropriate level.

When visits involve significant counseling or coordination, time-based billing often yields more accurate code selection. For example, a 16-minute visit spent entirely discussing treatment adherence barriers might lack complex MDM elements but justifies 99212 through time. Conversely, a 12-minute visit addressing multiple acute problems with prescription changes supports 99213 through MDM despite minimal time.

Telehealth and CPT Code 99212 Billing

CMS permits billing 99212 for telehealth visits using the same time and MDM criteria applied to in-person encounters. The 10-19 minute threshold or straightforward MDM requirements remain unchanged regardless of visit modality. Practices must append modifier 95 (synchronous telemedicine service) to indicate the virtual encounter, though some payers automatically recognize telehealth billing through place of service code 02.

Audio-only telehealth visits presented special coding challenges during the COVID-19 public health emergency, when CMS temporarily allowed E/M code billing for telephone encounters. As of 2026, most payers require video interaction for 99212 telehealth billing. Audio-only visits typically fall under separate telephone service codes (99441-99443) with lower reimbursement rates. Practices using integrated telehealth platforms should verify that video functionality operates properly before scheduling 99212 virtual visits.

Telehealth Time Tracking Considerations

Time-based telehealth billing for 99212 includes pre-visit preparation (reviewing labs drawn that day), live video interaction, and post-visit documentation completed immediately after. It excludes technical setup time, rescheduling calls, or pre-visit intake forms completed by staff. Many patient portal systems timestamp video session start and end times, providing automatic documentation of face-to-face interaction duration.

Some practices bill telehealth 99212 visits at lower rates than in-person encounters due to reduced overhead. However, CMS and most commercial payers mandate payment parity – the same reimbursement for virtual and in-person 99212 visits. Practices should verify individual payer policies, as some state Medicaid programs and smaller commercial insurers maintain separate telehealth fee schedules.

Expert Picks

Need structured E/M templates for your specialty? Digital Forms offers customizable 99212 documentation templates with built-in MDM level indicators and time-tracking prompts.

Struggling with claim denials for E/M codes? Claims Management Software provides real-time code validation and flags missing documentation before claim submission.

Want to optimize your E/M code distribution? Clinic Dashboard Management delivers E/M code analytics showing 99212 usage patterns and potential upcoding or downcoding trends.

Conclusion

CPT code 99212 serves as the primary billing code for brief established patient follow-ups requiring 10-19 minutes or straightforward medical decision-making. Accurate code selection depends on clear documentation of either total visit time or MDM complexity level. Clinicians choosing time-based billing must record all practitioner time on the visit date, while those using MDM-based billing need to demonstrate straightforward problem complexity with minimal data review and risk.

Common billing errors include using 99212 for new patients, insufficient time documentation, and MDM complexity that exceeds straightforward criteria. Practices should implement systematic time tracking, use structured templates for MDM documentation, and regularly review code distribution patterns to identify potential compliance issues before audits occur.

Frequently Asked Questions