Pabau Engage inbox

Pabau Engage is here: every patient conversation in one inbox.

Learn more
Book a demo Book a demo
☰
Aesthetics & Beauty

10 Best EMR Software for Medical and Aesthetic Practices in 2026

Avatar photo Katy Piper
Last Updated: October 6, 2026
Reviewed by: Avatar photo Lucy Galloway

The best EMR software for most private, aesthetic and multi-specialty practices is Pabau, an all-in-one practice management system. Pabau keeps charting, online booking, payments and insurance claims in one patient record.

Hospitals and health systems should shortlist Epic. Insurance-heavy primary care fits athenaOne best, and therapists get the most for their money from SimplePractice.

The top EMR software for a hospital is rarely right for a med spa, so we ranked 10 systems with the payer-mix fit test. How your practice gets paid decides which type of EMR fits, before features or price. Every price below comes from the vendor’s own website, checked in September 2026.

Key takeaways
Found our content helpful?

Key takeaways

1. Pabau — best all-in-one EMR for private, aesthetic and multi-specialty practices that take both self-pay and insurance.

2. athenaOne — best for insurance-heavy primary care that wants its fee tied to a percentage of collections.

3. Epic — best for hospitals and large health systems that need records shared across every care setting.

4. eClinicalWorks — best value for ambulatory groups, with published per-provider pricing and an RCM service option.

5. ModMed — best for specialty practices such as dermatology, orthopedics and ophthalmology.

6. Tebra — best for independent practices that bill insurance and want the EHR and billing in one subscription.

7. DrChrono — best iPad-native EHR for providers who chart on a tablet.

8. SimplePractice — best for therapists and mental health practices, from $49 a month.

9. Nextech — best for plastic surgery and ophthalmology practices running surgical and cosmetic work together.

10. Aesthetic Record — best dedicated charting app for injector-led med spas.

EMR software list: 2026 comparison at a glance

This table compares the 10 EMRs on what decides a purchase: Who each one fits, how it charges, and what you sign. Read the payer-mix column first.

EMRBest forPayer-mix fitPricing modelPublished starting priceContract or cancellation termsBuilt-in billing/RCMMobile app
PabauPrivate, aesthetic and multi-specialty practicesCash-pay and mixedFlat monthly fee by users and location$62/month (one user)Monthly or annual billing; annual saves up to 20%Yes, US claims via Claim.MDYes, Pabau GO (iOS)
athenaOneInsurance-heavy primary careInsurance-heavyPercentage of collectionsQuote onlyNot publishedYes, plus billing servicesYes
EpicHospitals and health systemsInsurance-heavyEnterprise quoteQuote onlyNot publishedYesYes, plus MyChart for patients
eClinicalWorksAmbulatory multi-specialty groupsInsurance-heavyPer provider per month, or percentage of collections$499/provider/monthNo start-up costs; term not publishedYes, with the $599 plan or RCM serviceYes, eClinicalMobile and healow
ModMedDermatology, orthopedics, ophthalmologyInsurance-heavy and mixedCustom quoteQuote onlyNot publishedYes, plus RCM servicesYes, iPad-native
TebraIndependent practices billing insuranceInsurance-heavyPer provider, bundledQuote onlyNot publishedYesYes
DrChronoProviders who chart on an iPadMixedTiered, quote-basedQuote onlyNot publishedYesYes, iPad and iPhone
SimplePracticeTherapists and mental healthMixedPer clinician per month$49/monthBilled monthly; 30-day free trialYes, insurance claimsYes
NextechPlastic surgery and ophthalmologyMixedCustom quoteQuote onlyNot publishedYes, plus RCM servicesYes, TouchMD photo app
Aesthetic RecordInjector-led med spasCash-payPer user per month, plus startup fee$15/user/month + $399 startupNot published; e-prescribing on 6- or 12-month termsNot advertised; POS built inYes, iOS

Six of the 10 vendors publish no price at all, and eight publish no contract terms. Treat a missing figure as a question for the sales call, not as a sign the product is cheaper.

1. Pabau — Best for private, aesthetic and multi-specialty practices

Rating4.7/5★★★★★Top pick
The bottom line

One patient record runs the chart, the booking, the payment and the insurance claim.

Who it’s for
  • Med spas and aesthetic practices
  • Private and multi-specialty practices taking self-pay and insurance
  • Dermatology and cosmetic surgery teams
  • Multi-location groups standardizing one system
PricingFrom $62/monthone user, full platform
What works
  • Photos, consents and injection plotting in the chart
  • Online booking, POS and memberships built in
  • Every subscription includes every feature
What doesn’t
  • Not a hospital or inpatient EHR
  • No outsourced billing service for high-volume insurance groups

Pabau is an all-in-one practice management system with the EMR at its center. Pabau’s EMR shares one record with scheduling, online booking, payments, marketing, inventory and reporting.

That matters most in cash-pay and mixed practices. A patient who books a filler appointment, signs a consent, gets photographed and pays should never be re-keyed into a second system.

Key features

  • Digital intake and consent forms: Treatment-specific medical questionnaires and consents feed straight into the patient record before the visit.
  • Treatment notes with injection plotting: Practitioners chart on a face map, log the product and units, and attach before-and-after photos to the same note.
  • Pabau Scribe, our AI scribe: Pabau Scribe drafts treatment notes and consultation summaries from the conversation, so charting doesn’t spill into the evening.
  • Prescriptions and safety checks: Prescriptions live inside the patient record, with cross-checks against recorded allergies and contraindications.
  • US insurance claims: Pabau connects to the Claim.MD clearinghouse for electronic claims, real-time eligibility checks, claim status and ERA posting.
  • Role-based access and two-factor login: Staff see only what their role needs. Role-based access supports HIPAA compliance in the US and GDPR in the UK and EU.
Pabau anti-wrinkle treatment note with a face map showing injection points on the cheeks and lips and the product and units logged beside each area
Pabau’s injection plotting logs each product and unit against the treatment area, so the chart doubles as the record an auditor asks for.

Where Pabau shines

  • One record for self-pay and insurance work: A dermatology practice can bill a medical visit and sell a cosmetic package without switching systems.
  • No feature gating: Every Pabau subscription includes every feature, so a solo injector and a 30-person group get the same platform.
  • Structured onboarding: New customers get a dedicated Client Coordinator and an onboarding portal for data migration, then a Customer Success setup phase.

Where Pabau falls short

  • Not built for hospitals: Pabau has no inpatient modules, so health systems should look at Epic, Oracle Health or MEDITECH.
  • No outsourced billing service: Your team works the claims in Pabau. High-volume insurance groups that want billing done for them will prefer athenaOne or eClinicalWorks’ RCM service.

Customer reviews

Pabau holds a 4.7 out of 5 rating from 652 reviews on Capterra, as of September 2026.

  • “Exceptional onboarding that exceeded every expectation.” — Paul W., GP, Capterra, February 2026
  • “Once everything is set up properly, it really supports both clinical and admin.” — Nicole F., pharmacy technician, Capterra, May 2026
  • “A little worried about customer support being mostly AI.” — Shannon L., director of operations, Capterra, June 2026

Who Pabau is best for

Pabau fits cash-pay and mixed-payer practices on the payer-mix fit test. That covers med spas and medi aesthetics clinics, cosmetic dermatology, plastic surgery, wellness and private practices that also bill insurance.

Book a demo to see Pabau configured around the way your practice gets paid.

Pricing

PlanPriceUsersKey inclusions
Starter$62/month1 user, up to 100 patientsFull platform
SoloQuoted on a demo1 user, unlimited patientsFull platform
Team, Medium, GroupQuoted on a demo2–15 usersFull platform
EnterpriseQuoted on a demo16+ users, multi-locationFull platform

Pabau prices by location and number of users, not by feature, and annual billing saves up to 20%. SMS, telehealth and Pabau Scribe usage run on top-up credits. The full breakdown sits on Pabau’s pricing page.

2. athenaOne — Best for insurance-heavy primary care

Rating3.8/5★★★★★Best for insurance-heavy primary care
The bottom line

The EHR, practice management and billing services come in one contract, priced as a share of what you collect.

Who it’s for
  • Primary care and family medicine
  • Practices where most revenue comes from claims
  • Groups that want billing work taken off their team
Pricing% of collectionsrate quoted per practice
What works
  • Claims, eligibility and denial work handled as a service
  • Fee rises and falls with your collections
  • Large payer network behind the rules engine
What doesn’t
  • Rate not published, so budgeting needs a quote
  • Reviewers report a click-heavy interface

athenaOne is athenahealth’s cloud platform, combining the EHR, practice management and revenue cycle services in one subscription. athenaOne is among the top EMR software choices for primary care because the billing work is part of the product.

Key features

  • Revenue cycle services: athenahealth works claims, eligibility checks and denials for you, rather than leaving that work to your front desk.
  • Clinical documentation: The EHR covers charting, e-prescribing, orders, and quality and MIPS reporting for value-based programs.
  • Patient engagement: A patient portal, reminders and online payments come bundled with the platform.

Where athenaOne shines

  • Aligned incentives: athenahealth only earns more when you collect more, so slow claims hurt both sides.
  • Less billing headcount: Practices that would otherwise hire a biller get that work inside the subscription.

Where athenaOne falls short

  • Opaque cost: The percentage isn’t published, so you can’t compare it with a flat fee until you have a quote.
  • Weak fit for self-pay work: Cash-pay services like aesthetics still need POS, packages and photo tools that athenaOne doesn’t center on.

Customer reviews

athenaOne holds a 3.8 out of 5 rating from 913 reviews on Capterra, as of September 2026.

  • “EMR really easy to handle for multiple patients. Good for middle to small size practices.” — Jonathan S., Capterra, July 2025
  • “The portal is incredibly slow and very glitchy requiring me to reload the page often.” — Erika B., Capterra, June 2025

Who athenaOne is best for

athenaOne fits the insurance-heavy branch of the payer-mix fit test: Primary care, pediatrics and internal medicine groups where nearly every visit ends in a claim. Our eClinicalWorks vs athenahealth comparison sets the two insurance-first options side by side.

Pricing

PlanPriceUsersKey inclusions
athenaOnePercentage of collections, rate not publishedPer practiceEHR, practice management, billing services, patient engagement

athenahealth states that athenaOne is priced as a percentage of collections and quotes each practice individually. No rate appears on the vendor’s site, so ask for it in writing alongside any implementation fees.

3. Epic — Best for hospitals and large health systems

Rating4.4/5★★★★★Best for hospitals
The bottom line

The most widely used hospital EHR in the US, built to share records across every setting a patient touches.

Who it’s for
  • Hospitals and academic medical centers
  • Large multi-specialty health systems
  • Practices affiliated with an Epic hospital
PricingQuote onlyenterprise contracts
What works
  • Records follow the patient across hospital and practice
  • MyChart patient app is widely recognized
  • Modules for nearly every specialty
What doesn’t
  • Implementation cost and timeline suit large organizations
  • Overbuilt for a small independent practice

Epic is the EHR behind 43.7% of US acute care hospitals, according to KLAS. Epic serves health systems, hospitals and their affiliated practices, with MyChart as the patient-facing app.

Epic software homepage showing links for health systems and clinics, standalone specialties, payers, post-acute care and patient experience
Epic’s product map spans health systems, specialties, payers and post-acute care, which is why Epic suits organizations rather than single practices.

Key features

  • Interoperability: Care Everywhere exchanges records with other Epic sites and outside organizations, so referrals arrive with history attached.
  • MyChart: Patients book, message, pay and read results in one app.
  • Revenue cycle: Hospital and professional billing run inside the same system as the chart.

Where Epic shines

  • Breadth: Inpatient, outpatient, emergency and specialty workflows live in one record.
  • Affiliate access: Through Epic’s Community Connect program, independent practices can run on a partner hospital’s Epic instance.

Where Epic falls short

  • Cost and effort: Implementation is priced and staffed for health systems, not a five-provider practice.
  • Learning curve: Reviewers mention heavy clicking before users get fluent.

Customer reviews

Epic holds a 4.4 out of 5 rating from 456 reviews on Capterra, as of September 2026.

  • “Great interface! User friendly! 100% Recommend!” — Carlie R., Capterra, February 2026
  • “The overall interface can be clunky and have a lot of button pressing just to get to one thing.” — Kathleen B., Capterra, May 2025

Who Epic is best for

Epic is the strongest hospital EHR on this list. On the payer-mix fit test it sits firmly in the insurance-heavy branch, with scale that only a hospital or health system uses fully.

Pricing

PlanPriceUsersKey inclusions
Epic enterprise licenseContact sales / no published pricingHospitals and health systemsFull EHR, revenue cycle, MyChart
Community ConnectSet by the host health systemAffiliated practicesAccess to the host’s Epic instance

Epic publishes no prices. Practices joining through Community Connect negotiate terms with the host hospital rather than with Epic.

4. eClinicalWorks — Best value for ambulatory multi-specialty groups

Rating3.3/5★★★★★Best value for ambulatory groups
The bottom line

One of the few EHRs that publishes both a per-provider price and a percentage-of-collections price.

Who it’s for
  • Ambulatory multi-specialty groups
  • Primary care practices billing insurance
  • Practices comparing flat fees with RCM pricing
PricingFrom $499/provider/monthEHR only
What works
  • Published pricing with no start-up costs
  • healow patient app and portal included
  • Optional RCM service at 2.9% of collections
What doesn’t
  • Lowest Capterra rating on this list
  • Reviewers report slow support

eClinicalWorks is a cloud EHR and practice management system for ambulatory care. eClinicalWorks also runs healow, its patient app, and Sunoh.ai, its ambient AI scribe.

Key features

  • EHR plan inclusions: The $499 plan covers the EMR, patient portal, e-prescribing with formulary checks, registry reporting and cloud hosting.
  • Practice management: The $599 plan adds scheduling, billing and billing implementation services.
  • RCM as a service: For 2.9% of collections, eClinicalWorks handles claims, denials, rejections and appeals.

Where eClinicalWorks shines

  • Price you can model: Published per-provider and percentage prices let you run the worked example later in this article with vendor figures.
  • No start-up costs: eClinicalWorks states no start-up costs on all three plans, with training included for one to nine providers.

Where eClinicalWorks falls short

  • Service complaints: Reviewers describe slow support and features promised in sales that arrived late.
  • Extra fees at scale: Practices with more than nine providers pay additional implementation fees, and patient statements are charged per item.

Customer reviews

eClinicalWorks holds a 3.3 out of 5 rating from 396 reviews on Capterra, as of September 2026.

  • “The customization, especially Smart Forms and workflow tools, allows you to tailor processes to your clinic.” — Reneisha H., Capterra, May 2026
  • “Right now they want to charge all my 9 providers while we are waiting for medical records.” — Aamr H., Capterra, September 2025

Who eClinicalWorks is best for

eClinicalWorks fits insurance-heavy ambulatory groups that want predictable per-provider pricing. The RCM service suits groups that would rather pay a percentage than hire billers.

Pricing

PlanPriceUsersKey inclusions
EHR only$499/provider/monthPer providerEMR, portal, e-prescribing, reporting, hosting
EHR with practice management$599/provider/monthPer providerEHR plan plus billing and scheduling
RCM as a service2.9% of practice collectionsPer practiceClaims, denials, appeals and A/R management

All three eClinicalWorks plans state no start-up costs. Practices above nine providers pay additional implementation fees, and airfare for on-site training is billed separately.

5. ModMed — Best for specialty practices

Rating4.5/5★★★★★Best for specialty practices
The bottom line

Specialty-built templates that chart dermatology, orthopedics and ophthalmology the way those physicians think.

Who it’s for
  • Dermatology practices
  • Orthopedic and sports medicine groups
  • Ophthalmology and optometry practices
  • Gastroenterology, urology and OB/GYN
PricingQuote onlypriced by specialty and modules
What works
  • Specialty templates and coding suggestions
  • MIPS dashboards built in
  • iPad-native charting
What doesn’t
  • No published pricing
  • Thin on med spa tools like packages and injection plotting

ModMed, short for Modernizing Medicine, builds specialty-specific EHR and practice management software. ModMed’s EMA is the EHR, organized around each specialty’s exam and coding patterns.

ModMed homepage headline reading all-in-one, customizable, powered by AI, above a laptop showing patient volume and charges dashboards
ModMed sells specialty-specific EHR software, so dermatology and orthopedics practices start from templates built for their exams.

Key features

  • Specialty templates: Exam templates for dermatology, orthopedics, ophthalmology and more speed up charting.
  • AI documentation: ModMed Scribe drafts notes and suggests diagnoses and billing codes.
  • Analytics: Dashboards track MIPS performance, financial metrics and clinical outcomes.
  • Patient engagement: Portal, self-scheduling, secure messaging and telehealth.

Where ModMed shines

  • Specialty depth: Ophthalmology and dermatology practices start from exam templates built for them, which removes most of the setup work.
  • Mixed dermatology: ModMed handles medical dermatology billing well, which matters when cosmetic work is a smaller share of revenue.

Where ModMed falls short

  • Opaque pricing: Cost depends on specialty, modules and practice size, and ModMed publishes no prices.
  • Aesthetic workflows: ModMed lacks the injection plotting, packages and memberships that med spa teams use daily.

Customer reviews

ModMed holds a 4.5 out of 5 rating from 566 reviews on Capterra, as of September 2026.

  • “Stream-lined, efficient and time-saving all in one EMR.” — Lindsay H., Capterra, February 2025
  • “Too, too many clicks and page changes to complete notes.” — SC K., Capterra, October 2025

Who ModMed is best for

ModMed fits insurance-heavy and mixed specialty practices: Dermatology, orthopedics, ophthalmology, gastroenterology and urology. Choose it when specialty templates matter more than cash-pay retail tools.

Pricing

PlanPriceUsersKey inclusions
ModMed EMA and practice managementContact sales / no published pricingPer providerSpecialty EHR, PM, patient engagement, optional RCM

ModMed doesn’t publish prices. Ask which modules are in the base quote, because e-prescribing and telehealth may be priced separately.

6. Tebra — Best for independent practices that bill insurance

Rating3.9/5★★★★★Best for independent insurance billers
The bottom line

The EHR, billing and patient marketing tools from Kareo and PatientPop, sold as one subscription.

Who it’s for
  • Independent physician practices
  • Practices billing most visits to insurance
  • Low-volume providers billing under 100 claims a month
PricingQuote onlyper provider, bundled
What works
  • EHR and billing in one system
  • Bundles for EHR, billing or both
  • Low-volume provider tier
What doesn’t
  • No published prices
  • Reviewers report a hard cancellation process

Tebra formed from the merger of Kareo and PatientPop, and sells a certified EHR alongside billing and patient-experience tools. Tebra prices per provider rather than per user seat.

Key features

  • Certified EHR: Charting, e-prescribing with EPCS, and a patient portal.
  • Billing: Claims, eligibility and payment posting, sold as Billing Starter or inside a bundle.
  • Patient experience: Online booking, reviews and marketing from the PatientPop side.

Where Tebra shines

  • Modular buying: Practices can start with EHR Starter or Billing Starter and add modules later.
  • Low-volume tier: Providers billing 100 claims a month or fewer get a separate tier.

Where Tebra falls short

  • Add-on fees: EPCS setup costs about $75 per provider, and PDMP integration is $500 one-time plus about $50 per user a year.
  • Exit friction: Several reviewers describe difficult cancellations, so read the termination clause before signing.

Customer reviews

Tebra holds a 3.9 out of 5 rating from 1,384 reviews on Capterra, as of September 2026.

  • “The ease of use is amazing. Navigating through the system is fairly easy.” — Nicole M., Capterra, October 2025
  • “The process of cancelling our service with them has been the absolute worst experience.” — Robbie H., Capterra, November 2025

Who Tebra is best for

Tebra fits independent practices on the insurance-heavy branch that want EHR and billing from one vendor without outsourcing the billing work.

Pricing

PlanPriceUsersKey inclusions
All in One, EHR+, EHR Starter, Billing StarterContact sales / no published pricingPer providerEHR, billing and patient experience in chosen bundles
EPCS setupAbout $75 per provider, one-timePer prescriberControlled-substance e-prescribing

Tebra publishes its add-on fees but not its subscription prices. Pricing varies by provider count, modules and implementation needs.

7. DrChrono — Best iPad-native EHR

Rating3.9/5★★★★★Best iPad-native EHR
The bottom line

An EHR built to chart on an iPad or iPhone, with billing in the same app.

Who it’s for
  • Providers who chart on a tablet
  • Practices mixing insurance and self-pay
  • Small practices wanting EHR and billing together
PricingQuote onlyFoundation, Growth and Premium tiers
What works
  • Native iPad and iPhone apps
  • Customizable charting templates
  • Billing tools in every tier
What doesn’t
  • No published subscription prices
  • Per-message and per-fax overage fees

DrChrono is a cloud EHR and practice management system designed around Apple devices. DrChrono sells three tiers, from core EHR and billing up to AI tools and premium add-ons.

Key features

  • Mobile charting: Providers document, prescribe and review labs on an iPad or iPhone.
  • Custom templates: Practices build specialty forms and SOAP note layouts.
  • Revenue cycle: The Growth tier adds automated revenue cycle workflows.

Where DrChrono shines

  • Tablet-first design: Providers who see patients away from a desk chart in the room.
  • Published add-on fees: DrChrono lists overage and processing fees up front.

Where DrChrono falls short

  • Usage fees: Texts cost $0.05 each, faxes $0.07 per page and paper claims $1.00 each.
  • Dated interface: Recent reviewers call some workflows click-heavy.

Customer reviews

DrChrono holds a 3.9 out of 5 rating from 492 reviews on Capterra, as of September 2026.

  • “The interface is outdated, non-intuitive, and clunky — basic workflows require excessive clicks.” — Ahmad B., Capterra, October 2025

Who DrChrono is best for

DrChrono fits mixed-payer practices whose providers want to chart on a tablet and bill from the same app.

Pricing

PlanPriceUsersKey inclusions
FoundationRequest a quotePer providerEHR, patient engagement, practice management, billing
GrowthRequest a quotePer providerAdds automated revenue cycle workflows
PremiumRequest a quotePer providerAdds AI tools and premium add-ons

DrChrono publishes no subscription prices. Extended lab integration costs $30 per provider per month, and card processing runs 3.25% plus $0.30 per transaction.

8. SimplePractice — Best for therapists and mental health

Rating4.6/5★★★★★Best for mental health
The bottom line

The easiest EHR on this list to price, set up and run for a solo therapist.

Who it’s for
  • Solo therapists and counselors
  • Small group mental health practices
  • Clinicians mixing self-pay and insurance sessions
PricingFrom $49/monthone clinician
What works
  • Published pricing from $49 a month
  • Telehealth, notes and claims in one app
  • Client portal and online booking
What doesn’t
  • E-prescribing and AI notes cost extra
  • Groups over five clinicians need a custom quote

SimplePractice is a cloud EHR and practice management system for therapists and other health and wellness clinicians. SimplePractice’s EHR bundles scheduling, notes, telehealth and insurance claims per clinician.

Key features

  • Therapy notes: Templates for intake, progress notes and treatment plans.
  • Telehealth: Video sessions launch from the appointment reminder.
  • Billing: Insurance claims and card payments from the same account.

Where SimplePractice shines

  • Transparent pricing: Plans are published, so a solo therapist knows the cost before a demo.
  • Fast setup: A 30-day free trial lets clinicians see patients on SimplePractice before paying.

Where SimplePractice falls short

  • Add-ons stack up: ePrescribe, Note Taker and Care Aide are billed on top of the plan.
  • Group scale: Practices with six or more clinicians move to custom pricing.

Customer reviews

SimplePractice holds a 4.6 out of 5 rating from 2,827 reviews on Capterra, as of September 2026.

  • “Automated appointment reminders via phone, text and email that seamlessly link to opening up the app for video appointments.” — Christine B., Capterra, March 2026
  • “Price is very expensive ($99 per month) and system issues at least 4 to 6 times per week.” — Tiffany W., Capterra, December 2024

Who SimplePractice is best for

SimplePractice fits mental health clinicians on the mixed branch of the payer-mix fit test. Some of their patients pay privately and others use insurance.

Pricing

PlanPriceUsersKey inclusions
Starter$49/month1 clinicianCore scheduling, notes and billing tools
Essential$79/month1 clinicianMore features, per the vendor’s plan comparison
Plus$99/month1 clinician; $74/month per additional clinicianMost features, per the vendor’s plan comparison
CustomContact sales6+ cliniciansGroup pricing

SimplePractice bills monthly and offers a 30-day free trial. Add-ons such as ePrescribe carry their own monthly fee and a one-time setup fee.

9. Nextech — Best for plastic surgery and ophthalmology

Rating4.1/5★★★★★Best for plastic surgery
The bottom line

A specialty EHR and practice management system for surgical practices that also sell cosmetic services.

Who it’s for
  • Plastic surgery practices
  • Ophthalmology practices
  • Dermatology groups with a surgical focus
PricingQuote onlycustom contracts
What works
  • Specialty templates for surgery and ophthalmology
  • RCM services available
  • TouchMD for photos and visual consults
What doesn’t
  • No published pricing
  • Photo capture runs through a separate TouchMD app

Nextech builds EHR, practice management and revenue cycle software for specialty practices, including plastic surgery, dermatology and ophthalmology. Nextech also owns TouchMD, a visual consultation and photography app.

Nextech homepage presenting its specialty EHR and practice management software for surgical and specialty practices
Nextech positions itself around specialty practices, which is why plastic surgeons and ophthalmologists see it on most shortlists.

Key features

  • Specialty charting: Templates tailored to plastic surgery, ophthalmology and dermatology.
  • Photo tools: TouchMD captures and compares before-and-after images for consultations.
  • E-prescribing: Bi-directional e-prescribing with allergy and interaction checks.

Where Nextech shines

  • Surgical plus cosmetic: As a plastic surgery EMR, Nextech handles surgical documentation and billing alongside cosmetic consults.
  • Multi-location support: Scheduling and reporting cover several offices and providers.

Where Nextech falls short

  • Cost: Reviewers describe Nextech as expensive, and no prices are published.
  • Med spa workflows: Injection plotting, iPad check-in forms and memberships are thinner than in aesthetic-first systems.

Customer reviews

Nextech holds a 4.1 out of 5 rating from 239 reviews on Capterra, as of September 2026.

  • “Disorganized, not user friendly, poor communication, poor service.” — Reza B., Capterra, November 2025

Who Nextech is best for

Nextech fits mixed-payer surgical practices: Plastic surgeons billing reconstructive work to insurance while selling cosmetic procedures privately.

Pricing

PlanPriceUsersKey inclusions
Nextech EHR and practice managementContact sales / no published pricingPer providerSpecialty EHR, PM, optional RCM services

Nextech doesn’t publish pricing. Its certification disclosures note possible additional per-provider costs for e-prescribing, so ask for those in the quote.

10. Aesthetic Record — Best dedicated med spa charting app

Rating3.5/5★★★★★Best med spa charting app
The bottom line

Photo-led charting for injectors, at the lowest published per-user price on this list.

Who it’s for
  • Injector-led med spas
  • Small aesthetic teams on iPads
  • Practices that bill no insurance
PricingFrom $15/user/monthplus $399 startup
What works
  • Before-and-after photo and video management
  • Memberships, loyalty and POS built in
  • 14-day risk-free trial
What doesn’t
  • E-prescribing and AI charting cost extra
  • Insurance billing not advertised

Aesthetic Record is a cloud EMR and practice management system for aesthetic practices and med spas. Aesthetic Record centers on charting, photos and point-of-sale checkout.

Aesthetic Record homepage presenting its EMR and practice management software for aesthetic practices
Aesthetic Record markets itself to aesthetic practices only, so its tools lean toward photos, charting and checkout rather than claims.

Key features

  • Charting: Treatment note templates and injection mapping for injectables.
  • Media: Before-and-after photo and video management inside the chart.
  • Checkout: AR Pay, memberships, loyalty programs and packages.
  • Engagement: Patient portal, two-way texting and automated reminders.

Where Aesthetic Record shines

  • Low entry price: $15 per user per month is the lowest published per-user price in this comparison.
  • Photo workflow: Photos and video sit next to the treatment note, ready for consultations.

Where Aesthetic Record falls short

  • Add-ons: E-prescribing with EPCS runs $40–$45 per prescriber, and ChartSmart AI starts at $30 a month.
  • Support: Reviewers report difficulty reaching a person for help.

Customer reviews

Aesthetic Record holds a 3.5 out of 5 rating from 76 reviews on Capterra, as of September 2026.

  • “AR responds timely and will work to reconcile challenges quickly.” — Robin J., Capterra, February 2022
  • “The chat feature is very frustrating.” — Christina K., Capterra, October 2022

Who Aesthetic Record is best for

Aesthetic Record fits the cash-pay branch of the payer-mix fit test: Injector-led med spas that bill no insurance and want charting ahead of marketing depth.

Pricing

PlanPriceUsersKey inclusions
Essentials$15/user/month + $399 startupPer userCore EMR, photos, booking, portal, inventory
Accelerator$19/user/month + $399 startupPer userAdds RepeatMD and PatientFi integrations, advanced dashboards, two-way texting
EnterpriseContact salesMulti-locationMulti-location dashboards and dedicated support

Aesthetic Record’s e-prescribing add-on runs on six-month or annual terms, with 20% off for annual billing.

Which is the best aesthetic EMR?

The best aesthetic EMR is Pabau for practices that want charting, online booking, POS and marketing in one system, and Aesthetic Record for injector-first charting.

Most aesthetic EMR software handles photos and consents. The differences show up in injection charting, memberships and whether the system can also bill insurance for medical visits.

Aesthetic EHRBefore-and-after photosInjectables chartingPackages and membershipsPOS and paymentsInsurance billingPublished price
PabauYes, in the patient recordInjection plotting and face mappingYesYes, plus Pabau Pay terminalsYes, US claims via Claim.MDFrom $62/month
Aesthetic RecordYes, photo and videoInjection mappingYesYes, AR PayNot advertised$15/user/month + $399
AestheticsProYes, AP Photo tools500+ customizable EMR formsLoyalty and membershipsYes, PCI-compliant POSNot advertised$160/month for up to 3 users
SymplastYes, photo and videoCustom mobile templatesRecurring billingYes, iPad and iPhone paymentsYes, e-claimsQuote only; 1-year agreement
PatientNowYes, RxPhotoAesthetic chartingYesYesYesQuote only; no contract
NextechYes, via TouchMDSpecialty templatesCheck with vendorCheck with vendorYes, plus RCM servicesQuote only

For AestheticsPro vs Aesthetic Record, the choice comes down to pricing shape. AestheticsPro charges $160 a month for up to three users, plus $85 per additional user, while Aesthetic Record charges per user.

Symplast suits plastic surgery and aesthetic teams that chart on iPads and want SymplastAI transcribing visits. Symplast’s standard agreement runs one year with monthly payments, plus a one-time setup and migration fee.

PatientNow suits growth-focused med spas that want marketing automation, and PatientNow advertises no contract and free onboarding. Some reviewers find its reporting hard to customize.

Cosmetic dermatology practices that manage before-and-after photos and also bill medical dermatology codes sit on the mixed branch. Pabau, ModMed and Nextech are the aesthetic EHR options that handle both in one record.

Best EMR software by practice type

The best EMR software for your practice type follows your payer mix. Hospitals choose Epic, insurance-heavy practices choose athenaOne or eClinicalWorks, and cash-pay aesthetic practices choose Pabau.

Practice typeTypical payer mixShortlistWhy
Hospitals and health systemsInsurance-heavyEpic, Oracle Health, MEDITECHRecords shared across inpatient and outpatient care
Insurance-heavy primary careInsurance-heavyathenaOne, eClinicalWorksBilling services or percentage-of-collections pricing
Independent practices billing insuranceInsurance-heavyTebra, DrChronoEHR and billing from one vendor
Small and solo practicesVariesShortlist by your payer-mix rowCompare published per-provider prices first
Dermatology, orthopedics, ophthalmologyInsurance-heavy with some self-payModMedSpecialty templates and MIPS reporting
Plastic surgeryMixedNextech, PabauSurgical billing and cosmetic sales in one record
Aesthetic and cosmetic practicesMostly self-payPabau, Aesthetic RecordPhotos, consents, POS and memberships
Mental health and therapyMixedSimplePracticeTherapy notes, telehealth and claims per clinician
ChiropracticMixedChiroTouch, ClinikoChiropractic and allied health workflows
Physical therapyInsurance-heavyWebPT, JaneTherapy documentation and outcomes tracking

Chiropractors usually shortlist specialty systems such as ChiroTouch, or Cliniko for mixed allied health teams. Neither is reviewed in full here because neither fits most readers of this list.

Smaller teams face a sharper version of the same decision, because one bad contract is a bigger share of revenue. Our small practice EMR guide ranks options by team size.

How to choose the best EMR software: The payer-mix fit test

To choose the best EMR software, start with how your practice gets paid. Then match specialty templates, compare pricing models at your size, and check contract and data export.

We call this the payer-mix fit test. In the practices we onboard, the most expensive mistake is choosing an EMR for its charting and discovering the billing model after signing.

1. Work out your payer mix

Look at the last 12 months of revenue and decide which of three groups you fall into. The three groups are Pabau’s rule of thumb, not a statistic.

  • Most revenue from insurance claims: You need an RCM-first EMR with a clearinghouse, claim scrubbing, eligibility checks and denial management.
  • A mix of insurance and self-pay: You need claims and cash-pay tools in one record, so one patient never lives in two systems.
  • Mostly self-pay: You need before-and-after photos, consent forms, POS, packages, memberships and online booking far more than a clearinghouse.

The decision tree below maps each branch to the picks in this article.

Decision tree for the payer-mix fit test: mostly insurance claims points to an RCM-first EMR such as athenaOne, eClinicalWorks, Tebra or ModMed, with Epic for hospitals; a mix of insurance and self-pay points to one record for both, such as Pabau, Nextech or ModMed; mostly self-pay points to a cash-pay-first EMR such as Pabau or Aesthetic Record. Then filter by specialty fit, pricing model, and contract and data export.
The payer-mix fit test sends insurance-heavy practices to RCM-first systems and cash-pay practices to aesthetic-first ones. Picks as reviewed in this article, September 2026.

2. Match specialty templates and must-have clinical features

Once the EMR type is set, check the clinical features your specialty uses every day. The old checklist of charting and patient records still applies, but these items separate products now.

  • E-prescribing and EPCS: Confirm controlled-substance prescribing is included or priced, because several vendors charge per prescriber.
  • Telehealth: Check whether video visits are included, metered by credits or sold as an add-on.
  • Patient portal: Patients should book, sign forms, pay and message without calling the front desk.
  • Interoperability and FHIR: Ask how labs, referrals and outside records connect, and whether the vendor supports FHIR APIs.
  • ONC certification and MIPS: Medicare-billing practices reporting under MIPS need an ONC-certified EHR.
  • AI documentation: Ambient scribes such as Pabau Scribe, ModMed Scribe and Sunoh.ai cut after-hours charting.
  • Photos and consents: Aesthetic and surgical practices need photos stored against the note, not on a personal phone.

3. Compare pricing models against your size

EMR vendors charge in three ways: A flat fee per provider or user, a percentage of collections, or an enterprise quote. The same practice can pay very different amounts under each.

eClinicalWorks publishes both main models, so it makes a clean worked example. At $10,000 collected per provider a month, 2.9% costs $290, well under the $599 flat fee.

At $40,000 collected, the same 2.9% costs $1,160. The break-even sits near $20,650 per provider per month, as the chart shows.

Bar chart comparing eClinicalWorks’ published $599 per provider per month flat fee with its 2.9% of collections RCM plan at illustrative collections: at $10,000 the percentage costs $290, at $20,000 it costs $580, at $40,000 it costs $1,160, against $599 flat each time. Break-even is about $20,650 per provider per month.
A percentage fee is cheaper for low-collecting providers and dearer for busy ones. Collections are illustrative inputs; prices from eclinicalworks.com, September 2026.

The comparison isn’t like for like, because the percentage plan includes billing work your team would otherwise do. Our breakdown of EMR software cost adds implementation and training to the total.

4. Check contract terms, implementation time and data export before signing

Contract terms decide how hard it is to leave, and most vendors don’t publish them. The ones that do vary widely.

  • Symplast: One-year agreement with monthly payments, plus a quoted setup and migration fee.
  • Practice Fusion: $199 per provider per month with a required annual commitment.
  • PatientNow: Advertises no contract and free onboarding.
  • eClinicalWorks: No start-up costs, with extra implementation fees above nine providers.
  • Pabau: Monthly or annual billing, with structured onboarding and data migration handled by a Client Coordinator.

Before signing, ask three questions in writing. How long does implementation take? What does data migration cost? In what format do you hand back our records if we leave?

EMR vs EHR: Does the difference change your shortlist?

No, because most current products do both jobs, so the best EHR software and the best EMR software share one shortlist.

HealthIT.gov defines an EMR as the digital version of the paper chart in one practice. An EHR is built to share information with other providers, such as labs and specialists.

Whichever term you search, the right system for you still depends on payer mix and specialty. Our EMR vs EHR guide covers the definitions in more depth.

What is the most widely used EMR software?

Epic is the most widely used EMR software in the US, running 43.7% of acute care hospitals at the end of 2025.

That figure comes from KLAS’s US Acute Care EHR Market Share 2026 report. Epic also covers 56.9% of hospital beds.

The top three are Epic, Oracle Health (formerly Cerner) at 21.9% of hospitals, and MEDITECH at 14.7%. Oracle Health is Epic’s biggest competitor by share.

The most popular EHR software in hospitals says little about outpatient practices, though. Any list of EHR systems in healthcare that stops at hospital vendors skips the practice-focused systems reviewed above.

How Pabau runs the EMR for private and aesthetic practices

Most private and aesthetic practices run the patient journey across four or five tools. Booking sits in one app, consents on paper, photos on a phone and payments on a separate terminal.

Pabau replaces that patchwork with an all-in-one practice management app, so each step lands in the same patient record. If you want to see that journey on your own services, schedule a demo with our team.

  • Online booking: Patients book themselves and pay deposits, so no-shows cost less.
  • Digital intake and consent: Forms go out automatically and come back signed before the visit.
  • Charting with photos: Practitioners chart on Pabau GO, our iOS app, with face mapping and before-and-after photos.
  • POS or insurance claim: Self-pay treatments check out through Pabau Pay, our card terminals, while medical visits go to Claim.MD as claims.
  • Automated follow-up: Aftercare, reminders and rebooking messages send themselves, so your team finishes on time.
Pabau client record showing a patient profile with tabs for appointments, chart, packages, communications, EMR and loyalty, plus chart sections for treatment notes, forms, photos, allergies, prescriptions and lab tests
Pabau’s Client records keep treatment notes, forms, photos, prescriptions and packages on one screen, so a mixed-payer visit never needs a second system.

Run charting, booking and billing from one record

Pabau keeps the chart, consent, photos, payment and insurance claim in one patient record. See how that works for your practice type in a demo built around your payer mix.

Pabau practice management dashboard

Conclusion

Decide how your practice gets paid before you watch a single demo. That one answer removes most of this list and tells you which pricing model to model.

Insurance-heavy hospitals and primary care belong on Epic, athenaOne or eClinicalWorks. Private, aesthetic and multi-specialty practices that sell self-pay services and bill some insurance get more from one record that does both.

The trade-off is depth versus breadth. RCM-first systems work claims harder, while Pabau covers booking, consents, POS, marketing and claims in one place. Book a demo to see how Pabau handles your payer mix from booking to payment.

Continue your research

Continue your research

Worried about moving years of patient records? EHR migration walks through the steps, timeline and checks for moving records without losing history.

Building a shortlist with your team? EHR selection lays out a process for scoring vendors and running demos.

Not sure whether you need a hospital-grade system? Ambulatory EHR vs inpatient EHR explains which type fits outpatient practices.

Running a practice on your own? Best EHR for solo practice compares options priced for a single provider.

Want a feature checklist for demos? EMR features lists the capabilities worth testing before you sign.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best free EMR software?

CharmHealth’s free edition is the best free EMR software for very small practices, covering up to 50 encounters and 1,000 patients a month. For a system with no license fee at any size, OpenEMR is open source, though you pay for hosting and support. Practice Fusion is no longer free and costs $199 per provider per month.

What is the best cheap EMR software?

Aesthetic Record has the lowest published entry price at $15 per user per month plus a $399 startup fee. SimplePractice starts at $49 a month and Pabau at $104 a month. A cheap EMR can cost more once e-prescribing, AI notes and texting add-ons are counted, so compare totals rather than headline prices.

Is Cerner or Epic better?

Epic is the stronger choice for most hospitals today, with 43.7% of US acute care hospitals against 21.9% for Oracle Health, formerly Cerner. KLAS reports Epic added 77 hospitals in 2025 while Oracle Health lost 56.

What are the top 3 EHR systems?

The top three EHR systems in the US are Epic, Oracle Health and MEDITECH, which together run about 80% of acute care hospitals. That share comes from KLAS’s 2026 market share report. For outpatient practices, the leaders depend on specialty and payer mix.

What is the best EMR for a small practice?

The best EMR for a small practice depends on payer mix: Pabau for self-pay and mixed practices, Tebra or eClinicalWorks for insurance-heavy ones. Our guide to the best EMR for a small practice compares options by team size.

How much does EMR software cost?

Published EMR prices range from $15 per user a month to $599 per provider a month, and percentage models start around 2.9% of collections. Most enterprise and specialty vendors quote only, so add implementation, training and data migration to any comparison.

Is Pabau HIPAA compliant?

Yes. Pabau is HIPAA compliant for US practices and GDPR compliant for UK and EU practices, with role-based access controls and two-factor authentication. Practices operating in both regions can run one system under both rules.

Found our content helpful?
×