CPT code 96375: Each additional IV push billing guide

Key takeaways

CPT code 96375 is the add-on code for each additional sequential IV push of a new drug. It cannot be billed on its own.

A primary code has to sit on the same claim, usually 96374, and every unit of 96375 must name a different drug.

Medicare’s 2026 national amount for 96375 is about $15.70 per unit, and the facility and office rates are identical.

Hydration codes never lead a claim that carries 96375, so a push outranks the bag for the initial slot.

Pabau pre-fills the claim from the encounter record, then checks the required fields are complete before submission.

CPT code 96375 is the add-on code for each additional sequential IV push of a new drug during the same encounter. It never travels alone. A primary code, almost always 96374, has to appear on the same claim. Every unit of 96375 must also point at a different drug in the record.

That second rule is where the money leaks. A nurse pushes ondansetron after ketorolac, the note reads “IV” instead of “IV push”, and the line denies. What follows is the pairing logic, the 2026 Medicare amounts, and the record entries that keep 96375 paid.

What CPT code 96375 covers, and why it is an add-on

The code describes each additional sequential intravenous push of a new drug or substance. It sits in the Therapeutic, Prophylactic, and Diagnostic Injections and Infusions section of the American Medical Association’s CPT code set.

The official AMA descriptor reads: “Each additional sequential intravenous push of a new drug/substance (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure).” That parenthetical is an instruction rather than a footnote. It tells you to report 96375 alongside a primary service code, most often 96374.

The plus symbol marks 96375 as an add-on code, and two hard requirements follow from that status. It cannot stand alone on a claim. The drug pushed also has to differ from the one billed under the primary code. A repeat dose of the same medication earns nothing extra.

• Code number: 96375
• Add-on status: yes (+), so it must accompany a primary code
• Category: Therapeutic, Prophylactic, and Diagnostic Injections and Infusions
• Administration route: intravenous push only
• Primary code required: typically 96374, the IV push of the initial new drug
• Drug requirement: each reported unit must be a different drug or substance

When a second push earns 96375

The code applies the moment a clinician pushes a second distinct drug during an encounter that already carries a billed initial push.

Every further drug gets its own unit. Those encounters show up in four settings more than anywhere else.

• Oncology infusion centers: a patient on a chemotherapy infusion billed under 96413 also receives an anti-nausea medication pushed as a bolus. That push is 96375.
• Emergency departments: a patient receives IV morphine for pain, then IV ondansetron for nausea. The second push is 96375.
• Infusion practices: a Myers cocktail protocol involves several vitamins and minerals pushed in sequence. Each different substance after the first qualifies.
• Outpatient practices: a patient gets IV hydration plus pushes of ketorolac and famotidine. A therapeutic push outranks hydration. Ketorolac takes the initial slot as 96374, famotidine is 96375, and the hydration reports as add-on 96361.

When 96375 does not apply: a repeat push of the same drug earns no additional unit. Drugs delivered over 15 minutes or longer are infusions, not pushes, so a different code family applies. And with no qualifying primary code on the same claim, 96375 denies outright.

96374 opens the encounter, 96375 repeats it

The split between the two codes is simple on paper and muddled in practice. 96374 is the primary. 96375 is the add-on that follows it, once per new drug.

A short way to hold it: 96374 opens the encounter, and 96375 repeats for every new drug after that. The sequence below tracks one four-drug encounter through the codes, including the push that earns nothing.

Six rules that decide whether 96375 gets paid

Payer edits enforce these automatically, so none of them are worth arguing with after the fact. All six are checkable while the encounter is still open.

1. Only four codes can lead the claim. The CPT parenthetical pairs 96375 with 96365, 96374, 96409 or 96413. Hydration codes are absent from that list, which is why a hydration bag never leads a claim carrying 96375.
2. One unit per new drug. Bill a unit for each additional drug pushed. Three different drugs after the initial one means 96375 x3.
3. The same drug adds nothing. Repeating a medication does not generate another unit. The descriptor says “new drug or substance”, and payers audit drug names against units billed.
4. Place of service has to match. Confirm the POS code reflects the setting where the patient was treated. A mismatch skews the rate calculation and invites a takeback later.
5. Sequential, not concurrent. 96375 covers pushes given one after another. Separate IV lines running at the same time bill differently.
6. No minimum time, but time it anyway. Push codes carry no time threshold, unlike infusion codes. Document start and stop times regardless, because that is what proves it was a push.

When a modifier belongs on the claim

Modifier use is payer-dependent. Medicare and most commercial payers accept 96375 with no modifier as long as the primary code is present.

A handful of contracts ask for one in specific situations, and the table below covers the three you are likeliest to meet.

Requirements shift by MAC locality and by private contract, so check with the payer rather than copying another practice’s habit. Applying modifier 59 without payer guidance can flag an audit on its own.

What the record has to show before you bill

Auditors reviewing 96375 look for a fixed set of elements. Miss one and the line is exposed to denial or recoupment, even where the care itself was appropriate.

Every claim should rest on documentation that includes:

• Drug name and NDC: the full name of each drug pushed, plus the National Drug Code where the payer requires it. Generic and brand names should match the pharmacy record.
• Dose and units: the exact dose given, such as 4 mg ondansetron, rather than the vial concentration.
• Route of administration: “IV push” or “IVP” written out. “IV” on its own is what downcodes a claim.
• Start and stop time: required by CMS and most commercial payers. It also proves the push ran under 15 minutes.
• Indication or diagnosis: the clinical reason for the drug, tied to the ICD-10 code on the claim.
• Nursing administration note: a contemporaneous note from whoever gave the drug, confirming it went in as documented.
• Physician order: a signed or verbal order on file authorizing the service.

A 60-second check before the claim goes out

Reading the infusion log once, in order, catches most 96375 denials before anyone hits submit.

Six steps, and they run faster than the sentence describing them:

1. Read out the drug names in the order they were given.
2. Confirm one of them is flagged as the initial push and carries 96374, or another qualifying primary code.
3. Count the distinct drugs that follow it. That count is your unit total for 96375.
4. Strike any drug already on the list. A second dose of ketorolac is not a second unit.
5. Check every push has a start time, a stop time, and the words “IV push” in the note.
6. Match the place-of-service code to the setting where the service happened.

Step four is the one worth slowing down for. A duplicate drug looks like two separate events in a log sorted by time. Sorting that same log by drug name instead makes the repeat obvious at a glance.

What Medicare pays for CPT code 96375 in 2026

Payment for 96375 is small next to the primary infusion codes, which follows from its add-on status.

The CMS Physician Fee Schedule sets the national amounts and your MAC locality adjusts them. Check the current figure before quoting it to staff or building it into an infusion revenue forecast.

Rate note: the figures above are approximate national amounts from published fee schedule data. CMS updates them annually and MAC localities adjust them. Verify the current amount in the CMS Physician Fee Schedule lookup before billing.

Why the office and facility amounts match

Three RVU components drive the calculation: work RVU for clinician effort, practice expense RVU for overhead, and malpractice RVU. The work RVU for 96375 sits below 96374, because each additional push takes less incremental effort than the first one does.

The practice expense RVU is where this code surprises people. Many services carry a higher office RVU than facility RVU, so the office amount runs ahead.

CMS assigns 96375 the same practice expense RVU in both settings, and 96374 behaves the same way. Both codes therefore pay one amount wherever the push happens. A place-of-service error costs you accuracy rather than dollars.

The diagnosis code decides whether it is covered

96375 does not establish coverage on its own. The ICD-10 code on the claim carries medical necessity. It has to justify the initial push as well as every additional one.

Our ICD-10-CM code library goes deeper on the individual diagnoses below.

The list is not exhaustive, and coverage criteria move by payer and by MAC locality. Some payers name specific diagnosis codes for particular drugs.

Read the Local Coverage Determination before assuming a diagnosis code guarantees payment.

Why 96375 claims get denied, and how to stop it

Denials cluster around a predictable set of errors, and each one has a pre-submission fix. That is why they belong on a checklist rather than a rework queue.

• Missing primary code: the most common denial by some distance. 96375 arrives without 96374 or another qualifying primary on the same claim.
• Same drug billed twice: two units go out, but the record shows one drug given twice. Payers match drug names against units.
• No IV push route documented: the note says “IV” without “push”. Where documentation could support either, payers downcode or deny.
• No start and stop times: CMS and most commercial payers require them for infusion and push services. Missing times lead to a downcode.
• Wrong place of service: a POS code that contradicts the setting. It will not change the 96375 amount, but it invites a review of the whole claim.
• Medical necessity not established: the diagnosis code does not support the drug given. Payers cross-reference the two, and a mismatch denies.
• Modifier misuse: adding 59 where the payer does not want it can trigger an audit. Omitting it where they do want it bundles the line away.

The infusion codes that sit around 96375

96375 belongs to a family of infusion and injection codes. The sequence you build depends on which of them led the encounter. Start with 96374, since it is the primary on almost every claim that carries 96375.

The AAPC Codify platform lists the full descriptor and parenthetical for each code in the range.

How Pabau keeps IV infusion claims complete

The costliest 96375 mistakes are the ones that reach the payer. Adding a missing drug name before submission takes seconds. Unwinding the denial takes days.

Practice management software like Pabau shortens that distance by keeping the clinical record and the claim in one system.

Pabau’s claims management software builds the claim from the treatment record itself. When a clinician logs an IV push, the system stores the drug name, dose, route and administration time in structured fields. Those fields then pre-fill the claim, so the details a payer audits are never retyped from a nursing note.

Before the claim goes out, Pabau validates that its required fields are complete. A submission then cannot fail on a blank nobody noticed. Practices submitting claims through Claim.MD also get eligibility verification up front. The coding judgment stays with your biller, which is where it belongs.

For infusion work specifically, that means nurses document once, in the system that produces the superbill. There is no handoff between a clinical note and a billing record. The drug names that support 96375 reach the claim exactly as they were charted.

Keep IV infusion claims complete from the first note

Pabau records drug name, dose, route and times on the encounter itself. Those fields pre-fill the claim, and Pabau checks it is complete before submission.

Book a demo

Conclusion

96375 is a simple code with an avoidable denial rate. The pairing rule, the new-drug rule and the documentation standard do not move. What moves from practice to practice is whether anybody checks them while the encounter is still open.

So decide where that check lives. One biller’s memory works until that biller takes a week off. Structured fields in the record work at any volume, and they survive staff turnover.

Book a demo to see how Pabau keeps infusion documentation and claim data in the same place.

Continue your research

Need the code that leads the claim? CPT code 96374 covers the initial IV push, including when it takes the primary slot ahead of hydration.

Billing hydration alongside the pushes? CPT code 96360 explains the initial hour of IV hydration and how the additional hours report.

Coding a chemotherapy encounter? CPT code 96413 sets out the initial infusion rules that supportive drug pushes attach to.

Giving the drug by IM or subcutaneous route instead? CPT code 96372 covers the injection code that sits outside the IV push family.

Want fewer denials across the whole billing workflow? Denial management in healthcare shows how to build a pre-submission and post-denial review process.

Frequently asked questions