Pabau GO app

The new Pabau GO is heredownload on the App Store

Download on the App Store
Book a demo Book a demo
Billing Codes

CPT code 11606: Billing guide for excisions over 4.0 cm

Key takeaways

Key takeaways

CPT code 11606 reports excision of a malignant skin lesion on the trunk, arms, or legs once the excised diameter passes 4.0 cm.

Code selection follows the diameter measured before excision, not the smaller figure a pathology report gives after fixation.

Missing laterality modifiers and size discrepancies between the operative note and pathology drive most denials on this code.

In 2026, Medicare pays roughly $460 to $470 in the office and $270 to $280 in a facility.

Practice management software like Pabau keeps the operative note, the measurement, and the claim record on one patient file.

CPT code 11606 covers the excision of a malignant skin lesion on the trunk, an arm, or a leg. The code applies once the excised diameter passes 4.0 cm. It is the top tier of the 11600 series, and it pays accordingly.

That price tag draws attention. Payers look at the size, the pathology, and the modifier before releasing money on a claim this large. Two diameters usually sit in the chart, one taken in the treatment room and one taken by the lab. Only one of them picks the code, and almost every 11606 denial starts with the wrong choice.

What CPT code 11606 actually covers

The code describes full-thickness removal of a malignant skin lesion and its margins from the trunk, an arm, or a leg. The threshold is an excised diameter above 4.0 cm.

Per the American Medical Association’s CPT code set, that diameter covers two things. It is the lesion at its widest point, plus the normal tissue taken on either side to reach clear margins.

Dermatologists, general surgeons, and plastic surgeons report it most often. In the CPT book it sits in the Integumentary System section, under excision of malignant lesions.

Method matters as much as size, though. Freezing, burning, or curetting a malignant lesion counts as destruction rather than excision. A lesion over 4.0 cm treated that way belongs to 17266.

Field Details
CPT code 11606
Official description Excision, malignant lesion including margins, trunk, arms, or legs; excised diameter over 4.0 cm
Section Integumentary System, excision of malignant lesions
Anatomical sites Trunk, arms, and legs, but not the scalp, neck, hands, feet, genitalia, or face
Size threshold Excised diameter greater than 4.0 cm, lesion plus margins
Pathology needed? Yes, malignancy is confirmed by histopathology under the applicable Medicare LCD
Global period 10 days

Size is the only thing separating the 11600 series

All six codes in this family describe the same procedure at the same sites, so the excised diameter picks the code for you. Bill 11606 on a 3.2 cm excision and you have upcoded, however clean the note reads. Lower tiers such as 11601 and 11603 exist for that reason.

CPT code Excised diameter Site Notes
11600 0.5 cm or less Trunk, arms, legs Smallest tier in the series
11601 0.6 to 1.0 cm Trunk, arms, legs Common for small basal cell lesions
11602 1.1 to 2.0 cm Trunk, arms, legs Frequent tier for intermediate melanoma
11603 2.1 to 3.0 cm Trunk, arms, legs Wide margins often push a lesion into this band
11604 3.1 to 4.0 cm Trunk, arms, legs The tier just below 11606
11606 Over 4.0 cm Trunk, arms, legs Highest tier for trunk and limb excisions

There is a second boundary worth watching. This series stops at the trunk and the limbs. Scalp, neck, hand, foot, and genital excisions belong to the 11620 range, which opens at 11621. Face, ear, eyelid, nose, and lip excisions run from 11640 to 11646. A site that contradicts the code series is one of the easiest denials for a payer to spot.

Automate claims and billing with Pabau
Pabau’s claims and billing tools keep the status of every excision claim visible, so a rejection surfaces the same week instead of a month later.

Which ICD-10 codes support the excision

Every claim needs a diagnosis code that names the malignancy you removed. Most pairings come from three families: melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Your Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) publishes the covered list in its Local Coverage Determination (LCD).

ICD-10-CM code Description Malignancy type
C43.59 Malignant melanoma of other part of trunk Melanoma
C43.60 Malignant melanoma of unspecified upper limb Melanoma
C43.70 Malignant melanoma of unspecified lower limb Melanoma
C44.529 Squamous cell carcinoma of skin of other part of trunk SCC
C44.621 Squamous cell carcinoma of skin of unspecified upper limb, including shoulder SCC
C44.721 Squamous cell carcinoma of skin of unspecified lower limb, including hip SCC
C44.519 Basal cell carcinoma of skin of other part of trunk BCC
C44.611 Basal cell carcinoma of skin of unspecified upper limb, including shoulder BCC

Code to the highest level of specificity the pathology supports. If the report names the left forearm, reach for the left upper limb code rather than the unspecified one. Unspecified codes on a high-value excision invite review, so dermatology practices are better off matching the diagnosis to the pathology line by line.

Modifiers an 11606 claim usually needs

Modifier choice follows the clinical story rather than habit. Leave one off when the payer expects it and you get a denial or a records request. Each row below pairs a modifier with the situation that triggers it.

Modifier Name When to use it Documentation trigger
22 Increased procedural services The work ran substantially beyond a typical case The note states the reason, such as depth, scarring, or tissue involvement
51 Multiple procedures A second procedure in the same session by the same provider The primary procedure is listed first without the modifier
59 Distinct procedural service A separate session, site, or indication from a bundled code An edit pairs 11606 with another code billed the same day
LT Left side The lesion sat on the left arm or leg Many payers expect laterality on limb sites
RT Right side The lesion sat on the right arm or leg Many payers expect laterality on limb sites

Modifier 22 deserves extra care. Reviewers rarely accept the operative note on its own, so attach a short narrative that spells out what made the case harder. Practices running high excision volume on skin clinic software build that prompt into the note template. The surgeon then writes it while the case is fresh.

What Medicare pays for this excision in 2026

Payment comes from the CMS Physician Fee Schedule, and it moves with locality and place of service. The figures below are 2026 national averages. Confirm your own numbers in the CMS lookup tool or your MAC’s fee schedule, because locality adjustments shift them either way.

Setting 2026 national average (approximate) Notes
Non-facility (office) ~$460 to $470 The higher rate carries the office practice expense
Facility (hospital or ASC) ~$270 to $280 The facility absorbs the practice expense instead
Geographic adjustment Varies by GPCI locality High-cost metro areas pay above rural localities

Commercial contracts usually land between 110% and 150% of the Medicare allowable, depending on the deal you signed. Place of service is worth a glance on every line, since the office rate here runs close to $190 above the facility rate.

The RVU math behind the payment

Medicare builds that payment from relative value units, or RVUs. The 2026 values below come from the CMS physician fee schedule file, and a conversion factor turns the total into dollars.

RVU component Non-facility value Facility value
Work RVU 4.89 4.89
Practice expense RVU 8.15 2.51
Malpractice RVU 0.84 0.84
Total RVU 13.88 8.24

Multiply the non-facility total of 13.88 by the 2026 conversion factor of $33.4009 and you get about $464. That factor applies to clinicians outside a qualifying alternative payment model.

The facility total of 8.24 works out near $275. CMS revises these values every year, so pull the current relative value files rather than trusting a cached figure.

Documentation that holds up under review

Medical necessity lives or dies on the note. Each element below either supports the code now or defends it later, during a post-payment audit. Writing them at the time of service beats reconstructing them from memory, which is where structured clinical records earn their keep.

Comprehensive patient records in Pabau
Holding the operative note, the lesion measurement, and the pathology result on one record means your coder never has to chase a number.

The checklist for an excision note

  • Pre-operative diagnosis: the assessment that identified the lesion as malignant or suspicious, recorded before the excision.
  • Lesion measurement: the widest lesion diameter plus the margins taken, measured and written down before you cut.
  • Site detail: the location in plain terms, such as left posterior upper arm, 8 cm below the shoulder.
  • Operative note: provider, date, technique, closure method, and anything unusual that would support modifier 22.
  • Closure type: simple, intermediate, or complex, described well enough to support a separate repair code.
  • Pathology report: the histology confirming malignancy, either attached or referenced by lab report number.
  • Diagnosis coding: the most specific ICD-10 code the report supports, with laterality where the site has a side.

Digital forms carry a lot of this for you. Let the intake forms and the operative template capture size and closure in the same record. Billing staff can then verify the claim before it goes out, rather than chase paper afterwards.

Customizable consent and intake forms in Pabau
Custom consent and intake forms in Pabau collect the lesion details and patient sign-off you will need if the excision claim is reviewed.

Where 11606 claims go wrong

Denials on this code repeat themselves. Billing teams working dermatology accounts see the same handful every month, which makes them straightforward to screen for before submission.

Denial reason Root cause Corrective action
Missing laterality modifier LT or RT left off a limb excision Add the modifier, then check payer policy for trunk sites
Size discrepancy The pathology diameter differs from the operative note Bill the diameter measured before excision, and say so in the note
Upcoding to 11606 The excised diameter belongs to a lower tier State the measurement method, then bill the matching series code
Pathology not on file Malignancy is still unconfirmed when the claim goes out Attach or reference the report, then resubmit with the documentation
Unbundled simple closure Simple closure billed as a separate repair line Drop the line, since only intermediate or complex repair can stand alone
Wrong anatomical series 11606 billed for a face or scalp lesion Use 11640 to 11646 for the face, or 11620 to 11626 for scalp, neck, hands, and feet

One more scenario catches people out. If pathology comes back benign, the excision moves to the benign series, where 11406 is the matching size tier for the trunk and limbs. Change the code before the claim leaves the practice, rather than after the denial arrives.

Repair codes you can bill alongside the excision

Closure decides this one. Simple closure is bundled into 11606 and never billed separately. Intermediate and complex layered repairs can sit on their own line, as long as no active NCCI edit blocks the pair.

Repair code Description Billable with 11606?
12031 Intermediate repair, scalp, axillae, trunk, or extremities excluding hands and feet; 2.5 cm or less Possibly, once you confirm the NCCI edit
12032 Intermediate repair, same sites; 2.6 to 7.5 cm Possibly, once you confirm the NCCI edit
13121 Complex repair, scalp, arms, or legs; 2.6 to 7.5 cm Possibly, with the reason for complex closure documented
13132 Complex repair, forehead, cheeks, chin, mouth, neck, axillae, genitalia, hands, or feet; 2.6 to 7.5 cm Site specific, so check that the anatomy matches
14040 Adjacent tissue transfer, forehead, cheeks, chin, mouth, neck, axillae, genitalia, hands, or feet; defect 10 sq cm or less Site specific, so confirm eligibility and the NCCI edit

Two of those codes cover the limbs and two cover the face, so match the site before anything else. When you do bill a repair with 11606, add modifier 59 only after confirming the edit can be bypassed. Then describe the repair on its own terms, with layers and total wound length, and most bundling disputes go away.

Walking a 5.2 cm forearm excision through the claim

Numbers make the rules easier to follow. A dermatologist removes a squamous cell carcinoma from a patient’s left forearm. The lesion measures 4.4 cm at its widest, and clearing it needs 4 mm margins on each side.

  1. Measure before you cut. 4.4 cm plus two 4 mm margins gives an excised diameter of 5.2 cm, and that figure goes in the note.
  2. Pick the tier. 5.2 cm sits above 4.0 cm, so the claim goes out as 11606 rather than a lower code.
  3. Add laterality. The lesion was on the left arm, so append LT where the payer asks for it.
  4. Match the diagnosis. Pathology confirms SCC of the left upper limb, which points to C44.629.
  5. Handle the closure. A layered intermediate repair can be reported separately once the current edit file clears the pair.
  6. Send the record with it. The operative note carries the measurement and the closure, and the pathology report confirms malignancy.

Run this check before you submit

  • Does the note give an excised diameter over 4.0 cm, along with the method used to measure it?
  • Does the documented site belong to the trunk, an arm, or a leg?
  • Is the pathology report on file, and does it confirm malignancy?
  • Does the diagnosis code match both the histology and the side?
  • Is every modifier the payer expects on the line, laterality included?

Pro Tip

The pathology report measures a specimen that has already shrunk in preservative, so it often reads smaller than the wound you made. CPT bases code selection on the diameter measured in the treatment room, before the excision. Write that number in the operative note and say when it was taken. That one line settles most size arguments with a payer.

How Pabau keeps excision notes and claims together

Most 11606 problems begin as documentation problems. The measurement sits in one system, the pathology result arrives by portal or fax, and the claim gets built from whatever the coder can find. Anything missing turns into a phone call, or into a denial three weeks later.

Practice management software like Pabau puts those pieces on one patient record. Treatment note templates can make lesion site, excised diameter, and closure type required fields. So the number your coder needs is captured while the patient is still in the room, alongside the photos, the consent, and the pathology result.

Billing then works from the same record. Pabau’s claims management tools check that the fields an insurer requires are complete before a claim can be sent. A status dashboard then shows what is pending, submitted, paid, or in error. A rejected excision claim shows up on a screen your team already watches.

  • Structured treatment notes: make site, excised diameter, and closure type required fields on every excision template.
  • One patient record: photos, consent, pathology, and invoices sit together, so nothing gets chased at coding time.
  • Claim status in view: a dashboard shows pending, submitted, paid, and error states, so no claim sits unworked.
  • An audit-ready trail: Pabau’s compliance tools keep the record history a post-payment review asks for.

Keep excision notes and claims on one record

Pabau holds treatment notes, photos, pathology results, and claim status on a single patient record. Your billing team can check an excision claim before it ever leaves the practice.

Pabau practice management dashboard

Conclusion

On an 11606 case, the surgery is rarely what costs you the payment. A diameter recorded at the wrong moment does, and so does a diagnosis code that drifts from the histology. Neither takes long to put right. Both have to be right before the claim leaves the practice.

So treat the operative note as the first draft of the claim. Get the measurement, the site, the closure, and the pathology reference into it while the case is fresh. Coding then becomes a lookup rather than an investigation. Book a demo to see how Pabau keeps excision documentation and claim status on one patient record.

Continue your research

Continue your research

Treating the lesion with destruction instead of excision? 17280 sets out the documentation and payment rules for destroying a malignant lesion.

Clearing actinic keratoses in the same visit? 17000 explains how the premalignant destruction codes are counted and billed.

Working a benign excision on the face? 11443 walks through the size tiers and the documentation reviewers expect.

Unsure how long to keep the operative record? Medical record retention rules breaks the requirements down state by state.

Frequently asked questions

What if the pathology report comes back benign?

Bill the benign excision series instead. For the trunk, arms, or legs, 11406 is the tier for an excised diameter over 4.0 cm. Correct the code before the claim goes out, because a malignant code with benign histology will not survive review.

Can I report 11606 twice in one visit?

Yes, when two separate malignant lesions are excised. Report each lesion on its own line with its own excised diameter, and never add the diameters together. Your payer decides whether the second line needs modifier 51 or 59.

How does the 10-day global period affect follow-up visits?

Routine wound checks in those 10 days fall inside the surgical package, so they are not billed separately. If the patient returns for an unrelated problem in that window, append modifier 24 to the office visit and document the different reason.

Is Mohs surgery ever reported with 11606?

No. Mohs micrographic surgery uses codes 17311 through 17315. Those codes already include the surgical stages and the pathology done by the same physician. Adding an excision code for the same lesion duplicates work that is already paid for.

Does 11606 need prior authorization?

Original Medicare does not require prior authorization for an office excision. Some commercial plans do ask for it on larger excisions, so check the plan’s surgical policy before the appointment rather than after the denial.

×