Pabau Engage inbox

Pabau Engage is here: every patient conversation in one inbox.

Learn more
ICD-10-CM Code

ICD code S52.233F – Displaced oblique fracture of shaft of unspecified ulna

Billable Code Specific Code


Code Definition

S52.233F is the billable ICD-10-CM code for displaced oblique fracture of shaft of unspecified ulna, subsequent encounter for open fracture type IIIA, IIIB, or IIIC with routine healing.

That grade is the part billers get wrong. Coders reach for E, which covers milder type I and II wounds, and the claim stops matching the trauma record.

Chapter
S00-T88 Injury, poisoning and certain other consequences of external causes
Category
S52 Fracture of forearm
Group
S52.233 Displaced oblique fracture of shaft of unspecified ulna
Billable
Yes
Save time. Improve accuracy. Get paid faster.
Automate coding with Pabau

Let Pabau's smart automation suggest the right codes, reduce claim denials, and keep your practice compliant—effortlessly.

  • AI-powered code suggestions
  • Real-time compliance checks
  • Faster claims, fewer denials
Why practices choose Pabau
Save hours every week

Automate repetitive tasks and focus on what matters most—your patients.

Improve accuracy

Reduce coding errors and ensure compliance with the latest regulations.

Get paid faster

Clean claims, fewer denials, and faster reimbursements.

Grow with confidence

Powerful insights and reporting to help your practice thrive.

HIPAA compliant SOC 2 certified GDPR-compliant Trusted by 4,000+ clinics worldwide

Key takeaways

Key takeaways

ICD-10 code S52.233F describes a displaced oblique fracture of the shaft of an unspecified ulna. The bone is the ulna, not the radius.

The 7th character F means a subsequent encounter for an open type IIIA, IIIB, or IIIC fracture with routine healing. Type I and II wounds take E instead.

The 6th character 3 carries both displacement and laterality. It means displaced, side not documented, so S52.231- and S52.232- are the right and left options.

Radial shaft fractures sit in a separate family at S52.3-. Picking the wrong bone puts the claim at odds with the operative report.

Practice management software like Pabau seeds the diagnosis into the claim form from the record, then submits it through Claim.MD in the US.

What ICD-10 code S52.233F actually says, word for word

According to the CDC/NCHS ICD-10-CM web tool, S52.233F is a valid, billable code.

The official description spells out every element. Displaced oblique fracture of shaft of unspecified ulna, subsequent encounter for open fracture type IIIA, IIIB, or IIIC with routine healing.

AttributeDetail
CodeS52.233F
Full descriptionDisplaced oblique fracture of shaft of unspecified ulna, subsequent encounter for open fracture type IIIA, IIIB, or IIIC with routine healing
Code systemICD-10-CM (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification)
Billable statusBillable (7-character code, valid for HIPAA-covered transactions)
Valid FYFY 2026 (October 1, 2025 – September 30, 2026)
Parent subcategoryS52.23 – Oblique fracture of shaft of ulna
Parent subcategory groupS52.2 – Fracture of shaft of ulna
Parent categoryS52 – Fracture of forearm
ChapterXIX – Injury, poisoning, and certain other consequences of external causes (S00-T88)

Two details in that descriptor do most of the work. The fracture is oblique and displaced, in an ulna whose side was never documented. The wound was also graded Gustilo type III, above the milder type I and type II range. Each of those facts lives in its own character position.

Every character in S52.233F narrows the diagnosis one step further

Read the code from left to right and it travels from body region to wound grade in seven steps. Misreading any one position produces an invalid or incorrect code.

Here is what each position encodes.

CharacterValueMeaning
1SInjury and external cause (Chapter XIX)
2-352Fracture of forearm (category S52)
42Fracture of shaft of ulna. The radial shaft is coded to S52.3-
53Oblique fracture pattern (subcategory S52.23)
63Displaced, unspecified ulna (side not documented)
7FSubsequent encounter for open fracture type IIIA, IIIB, or IIIC with routine healing

The 5th character sets the fracture pattern

Within S52.2, the 5th character names the shape of the break. A 3 means oblique, so the fracture line runs at an angle across the shaft. The neighboring values cover the other patterns a radiologist might describe.

  • S52.20- Unspecified fracture of shaft of ulna
  • S52.21- Greenstick fracture of shaft of ulna
  • S52.22- Transverse fracture of shaft of ulna
  • S52.23- Oblique fracture of shaft of ulna
  • S52.24- Spiral fracture of shaft of ulna
  • S52.25- Comminuted fracture of shaft of ulna
  • S52.26- Segmental fracture of shaft of ulna
  • S52.27- Monteggia’s fracture of ulna

The 6th character sets displacement and side together

This is the position coders underestimate. In S52.23, one digit encodes displacement and laterality at the same time. Change the side and you also change the digit that proves displacement.

  • 1 Displaced, right ulna (S52.231-)
  • 2 Displaced, left ulna (S52.232-)
  • 3 Displaced, unspecified ulna (S52.233-, the code on this page)
  • 4 Nondisplaced, right ulna (S52.234-)
  • 5 Nondisplaced, left ulna (S52.235-)
  • 6 Nondisplaced, unspecified ulna (S52.236-)

An unspecified-side code is legitimate when the record genuinely never names an arm. It is not a shortcut for a chart that says “left forearm” in the operative note.

Character F is where the Gustilo grade decides the code

The 7th character is where most coding errors for ICD-10 code S52.233F occur. Character F does not simply mean “follow-up visit.” According to CMS ICD-10-CM guidelines, F designates a subsequent encounter for an open fracture graded Gustilo type IIIA, IIIB, or IIIC. The wound must be healing without complication.

The S52 category runs a full 7th character table, and it moves on two axes at once. One axis is the healing status. The other is the severity of the open wound. The grid below shows where every letter lands.

Grid of the ICD-10-CM S52 seventh characters by healing status and open-wound grade
Two questions decide the letter, and only one of them is about time since the injury. Grid built from the ICD-10-CM FY 2026 tabular list for category S52.

The tabular list spells out the same 16 options one letter at a time.

7th characterMeaningFracture type
AInitial encounterClosed
BInitial encounterOpen, type I or II
CInitial encounterOpen, type IIIA, IIIB, or IIIC
DSubsequent encounter, routine healingClosed
ESubsequent encounter, routine healingOpen, type I or II
FSubsequent encounter, routine healingOpen, type IIIA, IIIB, or IIIC
GSubsequent encounter, delayed healingClosed
HSubsequent encounter, delayed healingOpen, type I or II
JSubsequent encounter, delayed healingOpen, type IIIA, IIIB, or IIIC
KSubsequent encounter, nonunionClosed
MSubsequent encounter, nonunionOpen, type I or II
NSubsequent encounter, nonunionOpen, type IIIA, IIIB, or IIIC
PSubsequent encounter, malunionClosed
QSubsequent encounter, malunionOpen, type I or II
RSubsequent encounter, malunionOpen, type IIIA, IIIB, or IIIC
SSequelaAny

Character F versus character E. Both describe a subsequent encounter with routine healing. The only difference is the Gustilo grade recorded at the initial encounter. E covers type I and type II wounds. F covers type IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC. Verify the grade in the original emergency or operative note before you pick between them.

S52.233F only fits when all seven conditions hold at once

ICD-10 code S52.233F covers one narrow clinical scenario. Every condition below has to be present at the same time for the code to be appropriate.

  • Fracture site: Shaft of the ulna, not the olecranon, the ulnar styloid, or the radius
  • Fracture pattern: Oblique, as described in the imaging or operative report
  • Displacement status: Displaced, meaning the fragments have moved out of normal alignment
  • Laterality: Not documented anywhere in the record
  • Fracture type: Open fracture, Gustilo type IIIA, IIIB, or IIIC
  • Encounter type: Subsequent encounter, so a follow-up after initial treatment
  • Healing status: Routine healing, with no delayed union, nonunion, or malunion documented

A type III ulnar shaft fracture usually arrives through trauma surgery and then moves into orthopedic follow-up. Wound care and rehabilitation run for months afterward, so this code turns up repeatedly on the same patient.

Pro Tip

Copy the Gustilo grade out of the original operative note and into the problem list the day the patient transfers into follow-up care. Payers auditing fracture claims look for agreement between the initial encounter code and the 7th character used later. When the grade only lives in a scanned trauma record, coders default to the milder letter and the claim stops matching the chart.

A worked example, from the trauma bay to the follow-up visit

A patient reaches the emergency department with an open forearm injury after a motorcycle crash. The trauma surgeon documents a displaced oblique fracture of the ulnar shaft. The wound is graded Gustilo type IIIB. That encounter codes to S52.233C.

Six weeks later the patient turns up at an orthopedic office working from outside trauma records. Imaging shows callus forming, and the wound is closing without infection. No note in the file names the injured arm. That visit codes to S52.233F, and a note saying left would have made it S52.232F.

If the left-arm wound had been graded type I or II instead, the visit would code to ICD-10 code S52.232E.

One digit separates S52.233F from a dozen near neighbors

S52.233F sits inside the S52.23 subcategory. Seeing the neighbors side by side makes it easier to pick correctly when the side, the pattern, or the healing status is different.

CodeDescriptionKey difference
S52.231FDisplaced oblique fracture of shaft of right ulna, same 7th characterThe record names the right arm
S52.232FDisplaced oblique fracture of shaft of left ulna, same 7th characterThe record names the left arm
S52.236FNondisplaced oblique fracture of shaft of unspecified ulna, same 7th characterFragments stayed in alignment
S52.223FDisplaced transverse fracture of shaft of unspecified ulna, same 7th characterTransverse pattern rather than oblique
S52.253FDisplaced comminuted fracture of shaft of ulna, unspecified arm, same 7th characterBone broke into several fragments
S52.279FMonteggia’s fracture of unspecified ulna, same 7th characterUlnar shaft fracture with radial head dislocation
S52.233ESame fracture, subsequent encounter, open type I or II, routine healingLess severe open wound
S52.233DSame fracture, subsequent encounter, closed, routine healingThe skin was never broken
S52.233JSame fracture, subsequent encounter, open type IIIA to IIIC, delayed healingUnion is behind schedule
S52.233NSame fracture, subsequent encounter, open type IIIA to IIIC, nonunionNonunion confirmed on imaging
S52.233RSame fracture, subsequent encounter, open type IIIA to IIIC, malunionHealed in poor alignment
S52.233SSame fracture, sequelaLate effect once healing has finished
S52.333FDisplaced oblique fracture of shaft of unspecified radius, same 7th characterRadius instead of ulna, a separate S52.3- family

The last row is the one worth bookmarking. S52.233F and S52.333F differ by a single digit, yet they describe fractures in two different bones. Confirm the subcategory against the current fiscal year tabular list in the AAPC Codify ICD-10-CM lookup before you submit.

S52.233F is billable, but only if the note carries it

S52.233F is a valid, billable ICD-10-CM code for HIPAA-covered transactions. Payment, though, depends on a record that supports every element of the code. Thin documentation is the main reason payers deny or downcode fracture follow-up claims.

Seven checks to run before you submit the claim

  • Bone and site: The note must say ulna and must place the fracture in the shaft. “Forearm fracture” alone will not support this code.
  • Fracture pattern: The imaging interpretation or operative report needs to describe the break as oblique.
  • Displacement: Confirm displaced status. If the fragments were reduced, record the alignment seen at this visit.
  • Open fracture grade: The Gustilo type IIIA, IIIB, or IIIC classification must appear in the record. Without it, character F cannot survive an audit.
  • Laterality: Only use S52.233- when no side appears anywhere. If any note says right or left, switch to S52.231- or S52.232-.
  • Encounter type: The note must show this is follow-up care rather than the initial treatment encounter.
  • Healing status: Document the radiographic or clinical evidence of routine healing. Complications move the 7th character elsewhere.

How a fracture follow-up claim actually moves

The path from note to payment has five stops. A fracture claim can stall at any of them, and two of them cause most of the trouble.

  1. The provider closes the note. The coder then confirms the bone, the pattern, the side, the wound grade, and the healing status.
  2. The diagnosis and the CPT code for that day’s service go onto the claim line together.
  3. A clearinghouse screens the claim for format errors and payer-specific edits before the payer ever sees it.
  4. The payer adjudicates and returns an electronic remittance advice showing what was paid, adjusted, or denied.
  5. Any denial arrives with a code naming the element that failed, so the correction can be targeted.

Step one fails when the Gustilo grade sits in a scanned outside record that nobody opens. Step three fails when the claim still carries an initial encounter character months after active treatment ended. Both are cheap to catch internally and expensive to fix after a denial.

The CPT code you pair with S52.233F depends on the visit

ICD-10 code S52.233F is a diagnosis code, so it needs a CPT procedure code on the claim line. Which one belongs there depends on the service delivered that day.

CPT codeDescriptionWhen used
25545Open treatment of ulnar shaft fracture, includes internal fixation, when performedDefinitive surgical repair, billed at the initial encounter
25535Closed treatment of ulnar shaft fracture, with manipulationReduction without an incision, again at the initial encounter
99213Office visit, established patient, low-level medical decision-makingRoutine healing check with a limited exam
99214Office visit, established patient, moderate-level medical decision-makingFollow-up driven by wound or healing concerns
73090Radiologic examination; forearm, 2 viewsThe x-ray that actually covers the ulnar shaft
97597Debridement of an open wound, first 20 sq cm or lessContinuing soft-tissue care for the type III wound
97110Therapeutic exercises, each 15 minutesGrip strength and forearm rotation during rehab
20680Removal of implant, deepTaking out the plate or nail once the ulna has united

Note the imaging row. CPT 73100 covers the wrist, which is the wrong region for a shaft fracture, so forearm views under 73090 are the anatomically correct pairing. Wound care also keeps running alongside the fracture, so CPT 97597 shows up on many of these follow-up claims.

Global periods matter here too. Surgical fracture codes such as 25545 carry a 90-day global period, so routine follow-up visits inside that window are usually not separately payable. Check the payer’s local and national coverage determinations, because rules on fracture aftercare vary by contract.

Those determinations can outrank the diagnosis. Under LCD L33370, compounded inhalation solutions billed as HCPCS code J7604 are denied against every ICD-10 code, so a sharper diagnosis cannot rescue them.

Five mistakes that stall S52.233F claims

Forearm fracture codes generate more errors than most coders expect. Two bones, six pattern options, and sixteen 7th characters all intersect in one category.

These are the errors that show up most often in audits and denial reviews.

1. Coding the radius when the break is in the ulna

This is the error that costs the most. S52.2- is the shaft of the ulna and S52.3- is the shaft of the radius, and the two families mirror each other digit for digit. S52.233F and S52.333F look almost identical in a code list. Read the bone name in the descriptor before you copy a code across.

2. Character E and character F hinge on one Gustilo grade

Both letters mean a subsequent encounter with routine healing for an open fracture. The difference is the Gustilo grade. E is for type I and type II wounds, and F is for the type III wounds that involve extensive soft-tissue damage. Coding F on a type II injury overstates severity, and coding E on a type III understates it.

3. Unspecified laterality reads as a quality flag to payers

S52.233- exists for records that never say which arm was injured. The ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines still expect coding to the highest level of specificity available. Payers increasingly treat unspecified laterality as a quality flag, so query the provider rather than defaulting to the unspecified digit.

4. Character A belongs to the first treatment encounter only

Character A applies only to the encounter where active treatment happens for the first time. Every later visit, including therapy check-ins and healing assessments, needs a subsequent encounter character. Submitting A again after the initial treatment has already been billed reads as a duplicate encounter.

5. A change in healing status moves the 7th character with it

If the provider documents delayed healing, nonunion, or malunion, the 7th character has to move with it. For a type III open ulnar shaft fracture, that means J, N, or R instead of F at follow-up. Always code what this visit documents, not what the last visit documented.

Pro Tip

Build a forearm fracture audit into the quarterly billing review. Pull every claim carrying an S52.2- or S52.3- code. Check that the bone in the descriptor matches the operative report. Check that the 7th character matches the healing status documented that day. Then check the laterality digit against the chart. Catching these internally costs far less than answering a payer audit.

How Pabau keeps the diagnosis consistent across every follow-up

A type III ulnar shaft fracture generates claims for months. In most practices, someone retypes the diagnosis at every visit. That person also digs the Gustilo grade out of a scanned trauma record and rekeys it into the claim form. Each retype is another chance to land on the radius family or the wrong 7th character.

Practice management software like Pabau takes the retyping out. The claim form fills from the record. The CPT code attached to the service lands on the charge line, and the ICD-10 slots seed from the client’s recorded problem list. Built-in ICD-10-CM and CPT lookup libraries sit behind a search icon, so coders confirm a descriptor without leaving the claim.

Pabau’s approach to cleaner claims management is to check the required fields before the send button unlocks. US claims route through Claim.MD, our clearinghouse partner, for eligibility checks and claim status tracking.

When a payer pushes back, the denial codes that come back name the element that failed. Fixes then happen at the code level rather than through a blind resubmission.

Pabau checkout screen showing a completed appointment alongside an itemized insurer invoice
Pabau closes out the visit and raises the insurer invoice from the same checkout screen, so the follow-up charge is ready to submit.

Keep fracture follow-up claims consistent from visit one to visit ten

Pabau fills the claim form from the record and keeps ICD-10-CM and CPT lookups a click away. US claims go out through Claim.MD, with eligibility checks and electronic remittance advice built in.

Pabau claims management dashboard

Conclusion

The letter at the end of S52.233F deserves more attention than the six characters in front of it. Those six come straight off the imaging report. The seventh depends on a grade recorded weeks earlier, by a different clinician, in a record the follow-up practice may never open.

Fixing that is a workflow job. Move the Gustilo grade into the problem list the day the patient transfers into follow-up care, and the 7th character stops being a guess.

Practices that keep the diagnosis attached to the record spend far less time answering payer questions about fracture claims. Book a demo to see how Pabau carries a fracture diagnosis from the first encounter through to the last follow-up claim.

Continue your research

Continue your research

Coding an open fracture outside the forearm? ICD-10 code S92.311B works through the same encounter and open-fracture logic on a displaced first metatarsal fracture.

Managing denials across a long run of follow-up visits? Denial management in healthcare explains how to build a review process that catches repeat coding errors before they become write-offs.

Wondering what a clearinghouse does with a claim before the payer sees it? How Claim.MD clearinghouse works walks through submission, tracking, and remittance for US practices.

Frequently asked questions

Does S52.233F need an external cause code?

Yes. Add a code from the V00 to Y99 range describing how the injury happened. An external cause code is never sequenced first. Federal reporting is not mandated, though many payers and state registries expect it.

Can I use an aftercare Z code instead of S52.233F?

No. The ICD-10-CM guidelines keep aftercare Z codes off injury follow-up. Report the acute fracture code with the 7th character for a subsequent encounter, which is exactly what S52.233F is.

How long does the subsequent encounter phase last?

There is no time limit. The 7th character follows the type of care, not the calendar. Once active treatment ends and the patient enters the healing phase, subsequent encounter characters apply for as long as that runs.

Can S52.233F be the first-listed diagnosis on a claim?

Yes. When fracture follow-up is the reason for the visit, S52.233F leads the claim. An external cause code, or a code for a coexisting condition also treated that day, is sequenced after it.

Do I code the open wound separately?

No. The 7th character already reports the open wound at the fracture site and its Gustilo grade. Adding a separate wound code for that site double-reports the same injury.

Avatar photo
Monika Lazarevska
Content Writer

Monika Lazarevska writes content for owners and healthcare professionals who want clear, no-fluff content that actually helps them run their practice better. With a background in storytelling and SEO, she knows how to make even the driest topics worth reading. Off the clock, you'll find her in a café somewhere in Europe, probably with a good book and an even better coffee.
×